My title page contents
http://dubai-best-hotels.blogspot.com/ google-site-verification: google1aa22a1d53730cd9.html

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

DV What Reliefs the Magistrate may Grant to the Applicant - Aggrieved Person?


Domestic Violence laws

If you, being the aggrieved person, have reason to believe that an act of domestic violence has been committed or is being committed or is likely to be committed, you may give information about it to the concerned Protection Officer. You may so inform the Protection Officer of the concerned area either orally or in writing. (See. 4). You, as an aggrieved person, may even inform Service providers. As to who are service providers, the Act provides that a registered voluntary association or a registered company, whose objective is to protect rights and interests of women by lawful means, shall be the Service providers.

Protection Officer is an Officer appointed by the State Government in each district. As far as possible, a woman is to be Protection Officer.

What Steps are to be taken on Information or Complaint of Domestic Violence

In case you or anyone on your behalf, orally informs the Protection Officer about act of domestic violence, the Protection Officer shall reduce the same into writing. Then, you or the person, who so informs the Protection Officer, is supposed to sign that information which is called a complaint.

If you are aggrieved person, whenever a Protection Officer receives a complaint of domestic violence it is the duty of the Protection Officer to inform you that you have a right to make an application for relief. This relief may be in the nature of any of the following orders: 
(i) a protection order; 
(ii) order for monetary relief; 
(iii) custody order; 
(iv) residence order; 
(v) compensation order; 
(vi) more than any of the aforesaid orders. 
When incident of domestic violence takes place even in presence of a Protection Officer, it is his duty to apprise the aggrieved person of the aforesaid rights.

Remember, that aforesaid duty to inform the aggrieved person of the above rights is not only of Protection Officer, but also of police or service provider or Magistrate who receives a complaint of domestic violence.

Aggrieved person is also to be informed of the availability of service providers; Protection Officers; and free legal services. The aggrieved person is also to be apprised of her right to file a complaint under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code on the ground of cruelty.

What Other Steps are to be Taken by the Protection Officer or Service Provider-

When the aggrieved person informs the Protection Officer of domestic violence, the Protection Officer is to get the aggrieved person medically examined, if she has sustained bodily injuries. So. whenever you are given beatings or caused any other bodily injury, you may ask the Protection Officer that he should get you medico-legally examined or for medical facility or aid.

You, as the aggrieved person, may also ask the service provider for medical facility or medical aid.

The medical report is to be submitted by the Protection Officer to the concerned Magistrate and also to the concerned police station.

The Protection Officer is required to prepare a report about the domestic incident and submit the same to the Magistrate. Copy thereof is also required to be sent to the service provider.

Such a report can be submitted even by the service provider. Service provider is required to submit the same to the Magistrate and to the Protection Officer of the concerned area.

The Protection Officer is to apply for issuance of protection order. In this regard, application must be in the prescribed form and manner to the Magistrate. Such an application is to be filed by the Protection Officer only if the aggrieved person so desires. Protection Officer is also to ensure that free legal aid & services are made available to the aggrieved person.

Protection Officer shall forward copies of the complaint and report to the police officer in-charge of the concerned police station where incident of domestic violence took place. The Protection Officer is also to inform the service providers of the incident of domestic violence.

It is duty of the Protection Officer and Service Providers to make available to the aggrieved person a safe shelter home, if so requested by the aggrieved person. So in case you as aggrieved person need safe shelter, you may ask the Protection Officer and the Service Providers, as the case may be. A copy of report prepared by the Protection Officer or the Service Provider about lodging of the aggrieved person in the shelter home shall be sent to the Magistrate and the police station. Service Provider is to submit such a report only to the police station and not to the Magistrate.

How to Apply for Orders or Reliefs (section 12)

If you feel aggrieved on account of domestic violence, you or anyone on your behalf may present an application to the Magistrate for the appropriate relief or reliefs.

Even a Protection Officer may present an application to the Magistrate for the appropriate relief or reliefs in your favour.

Where to Apply for Orders or Reliefs (section 27)

Application for protection order or any other relief available under the Act is to be filed in the Court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class or Metropolitan Magistrate. You, being the aggrieved person, can file such an application at any of the following places: 
(a) where you, the aggrieved person, permanently or temporarily reside; or 
(b) where you, the aggrieved person, carryon business; or 
(c) where you, the aggrieved person, are employed; or 
(d) where the opposite party resides; or 
(e) where the opposite party carries on business; or 
(f) where the opposite party is employed; or 
(g) where the cause of action has arisen, say where the incident of domestic violence has taken place.

Procedure to be Followed by the Magistrate (section 13)

Procedure laid down under the Act is such that all the proceedings are conducted by the Magistrate expeditiously so that applications are disposed of without any kind of delay. As per procedure, on receipt of such an application, Magistrate is to fix the first date of hearing. Such a date shall not ordinarily be beyond 3 days from the date of receipt of application.

Notice of date of hearing is to be given to the Protection Officer. Protection Officer is to get the notice served, on the respondent-opposite party, in the prescribed manner. Magistrate may order service of the notice on any other person. Such order of service is to be passed within a maximum period of 2 days or such further reasonable time.

The Protection Officer entrusted with the notice is to make report about service of notice.

The Magistrate is to make endeavour for disposal of such an application within 60 days from the date of its first hearing.

Procedure to be Followed by the Magistrate (section 28)

If the Magistrate considers that the circumstances of the case so warrant he may conduct proceedings in camera. If you, the aggrieved person, or the opposite party desires, Magistrate may so order for conducting proceedings in camera. While proceedings are conducted in' camera, general public is not allowed to be present in the Court room or at the place where the proceedings are to be conducted.

Code of Criminal Procedure contains the procedure for trial of criminal cases by the Court. Section 28 provides that save as otherwise provided in the Act, all proceedings under sections 12, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 and offences under section 31 are to be governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure.

It is significant to note that the Act provides that the above provision does not prevent the Court from laying down its own procedure for disposal of an application which is under section 12 or under sub-section (2) of section 23. Therefore, Court need not follow the procedure prescribed under the Code of Criminal Procedure, while entertaining your application or on receipt of application from Protection Officer or while conducting proceedings on such an application or for grant of any relief including the relief of compensation or damages.

Provision for Undergoing Counselling

Law (section 14) provides that the Magistrate may, at any stage of the proceedings under this Act, direct the parties singly or jointly, to undergo counselling with any member of a service provider.

What Material the Magistrate is to take into Consideration before Passing any Order

Before passing any order, Magistrate is to take into consideration any report regarding incident of domestic violence submitted by Protection Officer or the service provider. As already indicated above, Protection Officer or the Service provider may submit report about domestic violence on the basis of information or complaint received by them or such incident having taken place in their presence or when such an incident is reported to them.

Reliefs

What Reliefs the Magistrate may Grant to the Applicant - Aggrieved Person?

(i) Compensation or Damages for Injuries

The Act provides that you may claim relief by way of compensation or damages for the injuries caused by the acts of domestic violence committed by the respondent. (Sub-section (2) of section 12)

(ii) Right to Reside in a Shared Household

Every woman in a domestic relationship shall have the right to reside in the shared household, whether or not she has any right, title or beneficial interest in the same. (Section 17).

It further provides that the aggrieved person shall not be evicted or excluded from the shared household or any part of it by the opposite party save in accordance with the procedure established by law.

(iii) Protection Orders

When the Magistrate is prima facie satisfied from the material placed before him and after providing opportunity to each of the party of being heard, that domestic violence has taken place' or is likely to take place, he may pass a protection order (under section 18) in favour of the aggrieved person and thereby prohibiting the opposite party from: 
(a) committing any act of domestic violence; 
(b) aiding or abetting in commission of domestic violence; 
(c) entering the place of employment of the aggrieved person; 
(d) entering the school or other place frequented by the aggrieved child; 
(e) attempting to communicate in any form with the aggrieved person (say prohibiting the opposite party from contacting the aggrieved person personally, orally or in writing or electronically or telephonic all y); 
(f) Alienating any assets used or held or enjoyed jointly by both the parties; or 
(g) Alienating any assets used or held or enjoyed by the aggrieved party alone; 
(h) Operating bank lockers or bank accounts used or held or enjoyed by both the parties jointly:
(i) .Operating bank lockers or bank accounts used or held or enjoyed. by the aggrieved person alone; 
(j) Alienating any assets, operating bank lockers or bank accounts (referred to above) or Stridhan or any other property, without leave of the Magistrate; 
(k) Causing violence to the dependants or other relatives or any person who assists the aggrieved person in protecting her from domestic violence; 
(1) Committing any other act to be specified in the protection order.

(iv) Residence Orders (Section 19)

Wife has a right to reside in the shared household. She cannot be expelled from there by her husband or any of his relatives. So when you being the wife feel aggrieved or apprehend expulsion from the shared household or have been expelled from the shared household, you have been provided remedy under the Act. Facts and circumstances of a case may require the aggrieved woman to live separately from the husband and his relatives. In such circumstances, order may be passed for same level of alternate accommodation for the aggrieved person or for direction to the respondent to pay rent to the aggrieved woman. This remedy is in the shape of residence order. When a Magistrate is disposing of an application under sub-section (1) of section 12, he, on being satisfied that domestic violence has taken place, may pass a residence order. A residence order would be to the following effect:
(a) restraining the respondent from dispossessing or in any other manner disturbing the possession of the aggrieved person from the shared household. Such an order can be passed if even the opposite party has or has no legal or equitable interest in the shared household.

(b) directing the respondent to remove himself from the shared household;

(c) restraining the respondent or any of his relatives from entering any portion of the shared household in which the aggrieved person resides;

(d) restraining the respondent from alienating or disposing of the shared household or encumbering the same;

(e) restraining the respondent from renouncing his rights in the shared household except with the leave of the Magistrate; or

(f) directing the respondent to secure same level of alternate accommodation for the aggrieved person as enjoyed by her in the shared household or to pay rent for the same, if the circumstance so require:

It is noteworthy that no such order under clause (b) is to be passed against any woman.

Imposition of Additional Conditions by the Court while Granting the Above Reliefs

The Magistrate may impose any additional conditions or pass any other direction which he may deem reasonably necessary to protect or to provide for the safety of the aggrieved person or any child of such aggrieved person. 

The Magistrate may require from the opposite party to execute a bond, . with or without sureties, for preventing the commission of domestic violence. Whenever any such bond is forfeited or any condition thereof is violated by the respondent, Magistrate is empowered to impose penalty upon the respondent and also to get the order implemented.

While passing an order under sub-section (I), the Magistrate may impose on the opposite party obligations relating to payment of rent and other payments. But in this regard, Magistrate is to take into consideration the financial need and resources of both the parties. By financial need" meaning thereby that the Magistrate is to consider if the husband is suffering from financial crisis or he has to support other members of the family like old aged parents or other dependents.

How and when to Get Protection Order Implemented with Police Aid The Magistrate may direct the concerned officer in-charge of the police station to assist in the implementation of the protection order.

Return of Stridhan and Other Articles to the Aggrieved Person

The Magistrate may direct the respondent to return to the possession of the aggrieved person her stridhan or any other property or valuable security to which she is entitled to.

(v) Monetary Reliefs

Such reliefs can be granted under section 20 of the Act. While disposing of an application under sub-section (1) of section 12, the Magistrate may direct the respondent to pay monetary relief to meet the expenses incurred and losses suffered by the aggrieved person and any child of the aggrieved person as a result of the domestic violence and such relief may include, but not limited to,-
(a) the loss of earnings;
(b) the medical expenses;
(c) the loss caused due to the destruction, damage or removal of any property from the control of the aggrieved person; and

(d) the maintenance for
(i) the aggrieved person, and
{ii) her children, if any.

Such an order of maintenance includes an order under or in addition to an order of maintenance under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 or any other law for the time being in force. The monetary relief granted under this section shall be adequate, fair and reasonable and consistent with the standard of living to which the aggrieved person is accustomed. The Magistrate shall have-the power to order an appropriate lump sum payment or monthly payments of maintenance, as the nature and circumstances of the case may require. The Magistrate shall send a copy of the order for monetary relief made under sub-section (1) to the parties to the application and to the in-charge of the police station within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the respondent resides. The respondent shall pay the monetary relief granted to the aggrieved person within the period specified in the order under sub-section (1).

Upon the failure on the part of the respondent to make payment in terms of the order under sub-section (1), the Magistrate may direct the employer or a debtor of the respondent, to directly pay to the aggrieved person or to deposit with the Court a portion of the wages or salaries or debt due to or accrued to the credit of the respondent, which amount may be adjusted towards the monetary relief payable by the respondent.

(vi) Custody Orders

The Act provides that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the Magistrate may, at any stage of hearing of the application for protection order or for any other relief under this Act grant temporary custody of any child or children to the aggrieved person or the person making an application on her behalf. Magistrate may also specify as to what arrangements are to be made for visit of such child or children by the respondent. (Section 21).

If the Magistrate is of the opinion that any visit of the respondent may be harmful to the interest of the child or children, the Magistrate shall refuse to allow such visit.

(vii) Compensation Orders

Under the Act, remedy has been provided to compensate the victim on account of domestic violence. The Act provides that in addition to other reliefs as may be granted under this Act, the Magistrate may on an application being made by the aggrieved person, pass an order directing the respondent to pay compensation and damages for the injuries, including mental torture and emotional distress caused by the acts of domestic violence committed by that respondent. So whenever you, the aggrieved woman, have been subjected to any kind of injury or mental torture or emotional distress, you shall be entitled to compensation or damages for the pain caused to you by the respondent. (Section 22).

Interim Reliefs

Interim relief is such a relief which is granted in favour of a party during pendency of the main petition or application. Such an order remains in force only during the period proceedings are pending in Court. For example, whenever any monetary relief is claimed, Magistrate may grant interim monetary relief to the aggrieved party, and the opposite party has to comply with such an interim order during pendency of the proceedings.

Ex-parte Orders (Section 23)

Ex-parte order is that order which is passed in favour of one party when the other party is not in attendance before the Court either because of non-appearance or having absented during the proceedings.

For an ex-parte order an application is to be filed before the Court. Such an application is to be supported by an affidavit of the aggrieved person.

The ex-parte order can be passed in proceedings in respect of protection order, residence order, custody order, monetary relief order, compensation order, mentioned above. (under sections 18, 19, 20, 21 or 22 
of the Act.)

Satisfaction of Magistrate before Passing Ex-parte Order

Before passing an ex-parte order, under sections 18, 19, 20, 21 or 22, the Magistrate is to satisfy that the application prima facie discloses that: 
(a) the opposite party is committing an act of domestic violence; 
(b) the opposite party has committed an act of domestic violence; 
(c) there is likelihood that the opposite party may commit an act of domestic violence.

Above Reliefts) Available under sections 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 can be Claimed in Other Legal Proceedings as well

It is significant to note that the reliefs available under Prevention of Domestic Violence Act i.e., the relief by way of protection order, custody order, monetary relief order, compensation relief, are not claimed only under this Act. These reliefs can be claimed in the proceedings going on before Civil Court, Family Court or Criminal Court. (Section 26). For example, such a relief can be claimed even in a petition for restitution of conjugal rights, annulment of marriage, divorce, maintenance, guardianship, custody of child or civil or criminal proceedings between the parties pending before Civil Court, Family Court or Criminal Court. But if the aggrieved person has already in her favour such an order in other legal proceedings, it is her duty to inform the Magistrate about existence of such an order.

The Act provides that provisions of this Act are in addition to provisions of any other law in force. It means any relief available under any other law can be claimed by the aggrieved person from the competent Court or Authority constituted under the law. So, these provisions are not in derogation of the provisions of any other law, for the time being in force. (Section 36).

It is also important to note that such a relief under the Act can be claimed even at the time of initiating of other legal proceedings. To claim such a relief in other legal proceedings, it is not necessary that other legal proceedings should have been initiated after the commencement of this Act. It means where any proceeding has already been initiated, aggrieved woman would be at liberty to file application in those proceedings to claim any of the reliefs under the Act.
For how Long the Protection 'Order shall Remain in Force A protection order (passed under section 18) shall be in force till the aggrieved person applies for discharge of the order (section 25). So, if you are aggrieved person and a protection order has been passed in your favour, Court shall order for discharge only on your application.

At the same time, it is significant to note that the aforesaid provision does not debar you as aggrieved person or as the opposite party, from filing an application before the Magistrate for alteration, modification or revocation of any order passed under this Act.

Before allowing application for alteration, modification or revocation of any order passed under this Act, you are to satisfy the Magistrate that circumstances have changed and the same require alteration, modification or revocation of the order passed earlier.

For example, in case of order of maintenance, Court may take into consideration subsequent change in the source of income or financial-needs of the opposite party or that of the applicant so as to modify the order passed earlier.

Passing of a decree of divorce is another circumstance, which may call for modification or revocation of any order passed under this Act.

You can Challenge the Orders Passed by the Magistrate by way of Appeal

Whenever a person feels aggrieved by an order passed by the Magistrate, he or she has a right to file an appeal against the order before the Court of Sessions. Court of Sessions is presided over by Sessions Judge or Addl. Sessions Judge.

There is Time-limit to File Appeal Against the Order Passed by the Magistrate

Appeal has to be filed within 30 days from the date of service of the order sought to be challenged. 

File Your Mutual Divorce - Right Now!

Call us at: 965049965 / or email at: tapsash@gmail.com


Click here to file for mutual Consent Divorce

Matrimonial laws in India:

Procedure followed in Matrimonial Petitions
Section 21 of Hindu Marriage Act provides that all proceedings under this Act shall be regulated as far as may be, by Code of Civil Procedure.

Restitution of Conjugal Rights
A husband has the right to require his wife to live with him wherever he may choose to reside. On the other hand, it is corresponding duty of the wife to live with her husband

Maintenance and Residence of Female Child
Under the Hindu Marriage Act, there is provision for permanent alimony or allowance. Under section 4 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, in case of annulment of a child marriage

Hindu Marriage Act
Hindu Marriage Act of 1955, came into force on 18th of May, 1955. It has amended and codified the law relating to marriage solemnized between two Hindus.

How Can A Hindu Marry from other Religion
Marriage between two persons, who are not Hindus, it would be a case of special marriage. In this regard, reference may be made to provisions of Special Marriage Act (43 of 1954)

Judicial Separation
Section 10 of Hindu Marriage Act provides for judicial separation. It provides that either party to a marriage can file a petition before the Court for such a relief.

Maintenance for wife, children and parents - Section 125 CrPC
When any person neglects or refuses to maintain, his wife, children or parents, than they can claim maintenance by filing an application before the Magistrate under Section 12

_Whether Sexual Intercourse based on promise to marry is rape?_

_Whether Sexual Intercourse based on promise to marry is rape?_

When consent of the woman for sexual intercourse is obtained based on promise to marry and it can be proved that the accused did not have any intention to marry the woman, the accused will be guilty of rape under Section 375 of Indian Penal Code.

*Read more at* http://bit.ly/2v1VSpj

woman would be entitled to permanent alimony from her former husband, even after the marriage has been annulled under Section 11

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana has ruled that a woman would be entitled to permanent alimony from her former husband, even after the marriage has been annulled under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

[ ```Read Judgment``` ]

*Read more at* http://bit.ly/2WKau8Q

Chances of getting Anticipatory Bail in cases of 498a/406


Chances of getting Anticipatory Bail in cases of 498a/406

The Supreme court quoted that the sections under 498a and 406 under the Indian penal code are widely misused and for no reason the husband and family members are prosecuted and jailed thereby tarnishing the reputation of the family the sections are exactly termed as legal terrorism.

Author Name:   nitish788

The Supreme court quoted that the sections under 498a and 406 under the Indian penal code are widely misused and for no reason the husband and family members are prosecuted and jailed thereby tarnishing the reputation of the family the sections are exactly termed as legal terrorism.

Anticipatory bail in 498a /406 offences

The Supreme court quoted that the sections under 498a and 406 under the Indian penal code are widely misused and for no reason the husband and family members are prosecuted and jailed thereby tarnishing the reputation of the family the sections are exactly termed as “legal terrorism”.

The supreme court in recent judgement of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar has made mandatory compliance of guidelines

All the State Governments to instruct its police officers not to automatically arrest when a case under Section 498-A of the IPC is registered but to satisfy themselves about the necessity for arrest under the parameters laid down above flowing from Section 41, Cr.PC;

All police officers be provided with a check list containing specified sub- clauses under Section 41(1)(b)(ii);

The police officer shall forward the check list duly filed and furnish the reasons and materials which necessitated the arrest, while forwarding/producing the accused before the Magistrate for further detention;

The Magistrate while authorising detention of the accused shall peruse the report furnished by the police officer in terms aforesaid and only after recording its satisfaction, the Magistrate will authorise detention;

The decision not to arrest an accused, be forwarded to the Magistrate within two weeks from the date of the institution of the case with a copy to the Magistrate which may be extended by the Superintendent of police of the district for the reasons to be recorded in writing;

Notice of appearance in terms of Section 41A of Cr.PC be served on the accused within two weeks from the date of institution of the case, which may be extended by the Superintendent of Police of the District for the reasons to be recorded in writing;

Failure to comply with the directions aforesaid shall apart from rendering the police officers concerned liable for departmental action, they shall also be liable to be punished for contempt of court to be instituted before High Court having territorial jurisdiction.

Authorising detention without recording reasons as aforesaid by the judicial Magistrate concerned shall be liable for departmental action by the appropriate High Court.

We hasten to add that the directions aforesaid shall not only apply to the cases under Section 498-A of the I.P.C. or Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the case in hand, but also such cases where offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may be less than seven years or which may extend to seven years; whether with or without fine.

But once FIR under 498a/406 is registered the apprehension of arrests looms even with the guidelines and safeguards as to be mandatory implemented by police. The police can follow the guidelines and can arrest the person . still the offences are non-bailable and possibility of an arrest looms on the person.

But generally the trend in court is that the anticipatory bail is granted in the cases of matrimonial offences under the penal code but very strict conditions are imposed these are-:

Return of dowry articles
As held in Vijender sharma v. state Anticipatory Bail was granted subject to the conditions that the petitioner will return all the gold/silver jewelry articles still in his possession to the complainant before the concerned SHO.  petitioner will deposit a sum of Rs.1 lakh additionally with the Registrar General of this Court in the name of the complainant, which amount shall be disbursed subject to the outcome of the trial of this case. The petitioner will join investigation as and when required and would not intimidate the witnesses.

2. By giving maintenance amount and returning jewellery
As held in Dr. Sunil Kumar V. State. With consent of parties, afore-noted applications are disposed of with the following directions:
(a) Rajesh would replace all the cheques which he has issued in the name of Shalini Arya pursuant to orders passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate in the proceedings under Protection of Women against Domestic Violence Act, 2005 by issuing cheques in the name of ‘Shalini’. This would be done within a week from today.

(b) Photocopies of the medical treatment of Baby Bhavishika would be handed over to Rajesh. Rajesh would be entitled to consult a reputed cardiologist and future medical treatment of Baby Bhavishika would be borne by Rajesh.

(c) Future medical of Shalini pertaining to treatment for tuberculosis by her would be reimbursed by Rajesh on the bills being furnished by Shalini to Rajesh.

(d) Rajesh would continue to pay to Shalini Rs. 10,000/- per month or such other amount as may be directed to be paid by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in the proceedings under Protection of Women against Domestic Violence Act, 2005 by means of a cheque payable in the name of ‘Shalini’.

(e) Rajesh would facilitate visit by the I.O. in company of Shalini to his house for opening the almirah in which cloths and jewellery of Shalini are stated to be kept. Shalini would be permitted to take possession of the same after an inventory is prepared.

(f) All the petitioners would cooperate with the I.O. in the conduct of investigation.

On compliance of afore-noted consent directions, in the event of arrest, petitioners would be released on bail by the I.O. on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of I.O.

18. It is made clear to Rajesh Arya that any violation of the terms of the consent directions would render liable to be withdrawn the benefit of the present order.

3. Bail without any condition of return of dowry items
In Vishal Arora V. state In my opinion, the petitioner cannot be denied bail on the ground that dowry and jewellery of the complainant has not been returned so far. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has taken a stand that the entire dowry and jewellery has already been returned to her. There seems to be a dispute between the parties on this aspect. If her dowry and jewellery is not returned, then she may take proper proceedings before the competent Court for return of dowry and jewellery as per law.

In the facts and circumstances of the case stated above, it is ordered that the petitioner may be released on bail in the event of his arrest on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. The petitioner is directed that he shall participate in the investigation as and when called by the Investigating Officer. In the event the petitioner fails to participate in the investigation, then the State will be at liberty to apply for cancellation of his bail.

4. Bail as contents of FIR are vague
In the present case of Pavitra Uraon And Ors. vs State of Chhattisgarh, if we consider the contents of the FIR, lodged by the complainant on 24-1-2007, it shows that she was being treated with cruelty by the applicant on account of demand of dowry. However, the specifications regarding dowry are vague and general pertaining to the items etc.

5. Complainant residing in matrimonial home
Proceedings under Section 498A/406/34 IPC are not to be converted into recovery proceedings. However, it is the desire of a Court to try and ensure that matrimonial disputes are resolved. Attempts were made in the present case in this direction, but unfortunately have failed.

Considering the fact that the complainant is still residing in the matrimonial house, but in a separate portion thereof and the fact that she and her children are otherwise being provided with maintenance by the petitioner No. 1, I am inclined to admit the petitioners to anticipatory bail as prayed for. It has to be additionally noted that the petitioners have cooperated with the investigating officer during enquiry. Since 6.2.2004 petitioners are under interim protection.

Petition stands disposed of with the direction that in the event of arrest, on petitioners furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 5,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, petitioner would be released on bail.

Conclusion
Generally the bail in matrimonial proceedings are easy but may come with stringent conditions. the Anticipatory bail in cases of 498a/406 are granted easily these days and conditions depends on facts of each case.

 


ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3
Print this Article

Author Bio:   Advocate Nitish Banka, advocate supreme Court of India. nitis

All you Need to Know about Domestic Violence Act: Law and Judgments




All you Need to Know about 

In this paper we present a comprehensive overview of an essential legislation i.e. The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005(hereinafter referred to as the Domestic Violence Act) drafted for women empowerment and for protection of women against acts of violence in India.

Scope of the Act

The scope of this piece of legislation has been expounded in plethora of judgements by the High Courts and the Supreme Court in India. For instance, in a recent judgment the High Court of Gujarat in the case of Bhartiben Bipinbhai Tamboli v. State of Gujrat and ors. (read here) while extensively discussing the provisions under the Domestic Violence Act remarked that:

The   domestic   violence   in   this Country   is rampant and several women   encounter   violence   in   some   form   or   the   other   or   almost everyday. However, it is the least reported form of cruel behaviour. A woman resigns her fate to the neve ending cycle of enduring violence and discrimination as a daughter, a sister, a wife, a mother, a partner, a single woman in her lifetime. This non- retaliation by women coupled with the absence of laws addressing women’s issues, ignorance of the existing laws enacted for women and societal attitude makes the women vulnerable. The reason why most cases of domestic violence are never reported is due to the social stigma of the society and the attitude of the women themselves, where women are expected to be subservient, not just to their male counterparts but also to the male relatives.

Till the year 2005, the remedies available to a victim of domestic violence were limited. The women either had to go to the civil court for a decree of divorce or initiate prosecution in the criminal court for the offence punishable under Section 498A of IPC. In both the proceedings, no emergency relief is available to the victim. Also, the relationships   outside   the   marriage   were   not recognized.   This   set   of circumstances ensured that a majority of women preferred to suffer in silence, not out of choice but of compulsion. Having regard to all these facts, the Parliament thought fit to enact Domestic Violence Act. The main Object of the Act is protection of women from violence inflicted by a man or/and a woman. It is a progressive Act, whose sole intention is to protect the women irrespective of the relationship she shares with the accused. The definition of an aggrieved person under the Act is so wide that it taken within its purview even women who are living with their partners in a live in relationship.

Who can file a complaint under the Domestic Violence Act?

Section 2(a) of the Domestic Violence Act defines “aggrieved person” as any woman who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the respondent and who alleges to have been subjected to any act of domestic violence by the respondent.

The Domestic Violence Act not only covers those women who are or have been in a relationship with the abuser but it also covers those women who have lived together in a shared household[1] and are related by consanguinity, marriage of through a relationship in the nature of marriage  or   adoption .

Even those women who are sisters, widows, mothers, single women, or living in any other relationship with the abuser are entitled to legal protection under the Domestic Violence Act.

What is shared household?

The term shared household is defined under the Domestic Violence Act as a household where the person aggrieved lives or at any stage has lived in a domestic relationship either singly or along with the respondent and includes such a household whether owned or tenanted either jointly by the aggrieved person and the respondent, or owned or tenanted by either of them in respect of which either the aggrieved person or the respondent or both jointly or singly have any right, title, interest or equity and includes such a household which may belong to the joint family of which the respondent is a member, irrespective of whether the respondent or the aggrieved person has any right, title or interest in the shared household[2].

In the case of S.R. Batra   & Another Vs. Smt. Taruna Batra[3], the Supreme Court with reference to definition of shared household under Section 2(s) of the Domestic Violence Act stated that the definition of ‘shared household’ in Section 2(s) of the Act is not very happily worded, and appears to be the result of clumsy drafting requires to be interpreted in a sensible manner.

The Court held that under Section 17(1) of the Act wife is only entitled to claim a right to residence in a shared household, and a ‘shared household’ would only mean the house belonging to or taken on rent by the husband, or the house which belongs to the joint family of which the husband is a member. In the case, the property in question neither belonged to the husband nor was it taken on rent by him nor was it a joint family property of which the husband was a member. It was the exclusive property of mother of husband and not a shared household.

Women in Live in relationships covered under the Act

A wider meaning to an “aggrieved person” under Section 2(a) of the Domestic Violence Act was conferred by the Supreme Court in the case of D. Veluswamy v. D. Patchaiammal[4]wherein the Court enumerated five ingredients of a live in relationship as follows:

Both the parties must behave as husband and wife and are recognized as husband and wife in front of societyThey must be of a valid legal age of marriageThey should qualify to enter into marriage eg. None of the partner should have a souse living at the time of entering into relationship.They must have voluntarily cohabited for a significant period of timeThey must have lived together in a shared household

The Supreme Court also observed that not all live-in­-relationships   will   amount   to   a relationship in the nature of marriage to get the benefit of Domestic Violence Act. To get such benefit the conditions mentioned above shall be fulfilled and this has to be proved by evidence.

Status of a Keep- The Court in the case further stated that if a man has a ‘keep’ whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or a servant it would not be a relationship in the nature of marriage.

In this case, the Court also referred to the term “palimony”which means grant of maintenance to a woman who has lived for a substantial period of time with a man without marrying and is then deserted by him[5].

Against whom can the complaint be filed under the Domestic Violence Act?

Section 2(q) of the Domestic Violence Act defines “respondent” as any adult male person who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person and against whom the aggrieved person has sought any relief under this Act:

Provided that an aggrieved wife or female living in a relationship in the nature of a marriage may also file a complaint against a relative of the husband or the male partner.

In view of the definition of the term respondent covering adult male person, the judiciary has time and again been confronted with the argument that an aggrieved person can file complain under the Domestic Violence Actagainst an adult male person only and not against the female relatives of the husband i.e. mother-in-law, sister-in-law.

However, the Supreme Court in the case of Sandhya Wankhede vs. Manoj Bhimrao Wnakhede[6] put ot rest the issue by holding that the proviso to Section 2(q) does not exclude female relatives of the husband or male partner from the ambit of a complaint that can be made under the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act. Therefore, complaints are not just maintainable against the adult male person but also the female relative of such adult male[7].

Wife cannot implicate one and all in the family– Though the Domestic Violence Act is a beneficial legislation, the same has been many times reported to be misused by women. For instance, in several cases women register complaint under Domestic Violence Actagainst one and all relatives of husband even without any evidence of abuse against them. In the case of Ashish Dixit vs. State of UP & Anr. the Supreme Court has held that a wife cannot implicate one and all in a Domestic violence case. In this case, the complainant apart from arraying the husband and in-laws in the complaint, had also included all and sundry as parties to the case, of which the complainant didn’t even know names.

Types of abuse under theDomestic Violence Act

The Gujrat High Court in a recent case of Bhartiben Bipinbhai Tamboli v. State of Gujrat and ors. (read here)elaborated on the types of abuse or domestic violence under the Act. The same is enumerated below:

Physical Abuse

Physical abuse is the use of physical force against a woman in a way   that   causes   her   bodily   injury   or   hurt.   Physical   assault,   criminal  intimidation   and   criminal   force   are   also   forms   of   physical   abuse   like  beating,   kicking   and   punching,   throwing   objects,   damaging   property,  punched   walls,   kicked   doors,   abandoning   her   in   a   dangerous   or  unfamiliar place, using a weapon to threaten or hurt her, forcing her to leave the matrimonial home, hurting her children, using physical force in  sexual situations.

Sexual Abuse

This is also a form of physical abuse. Any situation in which a woman is forced to participate in unwanted safe or degrading sexual activity, calling her sexual names, hurting a woman with objects and weapons during sex is sexual abuse.

Verbal and Emotional Abuse

Many women suffer from   emotional   abuse,   which   is   no   less   destructive.  Unfortunately, emotional abuse is often minimized or overlooked – even by the woman being   abused.

Emotional abuse includes   verbal abuse such as yelling, name-calling,   blaming   and   shaming.   Isolation,   intimidation   and controlling behaviour also fall under emotional abuse. Calls her names, insults her or continually criticizes her.

Economic Abuse

Economic abuse is not a very recognized form of abuse among the women   but   it   is   very   detrimental. Economic   abuse   mainly   includes   a woman   not   been   provided   with   enough   money   by   her   partner   to  maintain herself and her children, which may comprise money for food,  clothing,   medicines etc. and  not allowing a woman to take up an employment . Forcing her out of the house and   not   allowing   a   woman   to   take   up   an employment.   Forcing   her   out   of   the   house   where she   lives   and   not providing her rent, in case of a rented share hold also amounts to abuse.

Depriving her of all or any economic or financial resources to which the person   is   entitled   under   the law   or   custom,   restricting   the   woman’s access to the shared household. Disposing or alienating the assets of the women   whether   movable   or   immovable,   valuables,   shares,   securities, bonds and the like other property in which she may have an interest. However seeking maintenance to unjustly enrich one’s self and that too without providing the alleged act of domestic violence is a gross abuse of the process of law.

Duty of Courts while deciding cases under theDomestic Violence Act

In the case of Krishna Bhatacharjee vs. Sarathi Choudhury and Another[8], the Apex Court while elucidating on the duty of courts while deciding complaints under the Domestic Violence Act stated that:

It is the duty of the Court to scrutinise the facts from all angles whether a plea advanced by the respondent to nullify the grievance of the aggrieved person is really legally sound and correct.The principle “justice to the cause is equivalent to the salt of ocean” should be kept in mind. The Court of Law is bound to uphold the truth which sparkles when justice is done.Before throwing a petition at the threshold, it is obligatory to see that the person aggrieved under such a legislation is not faced with a situation of non-adjudication, for the 2005 Act as we have stated is a beneficial as well as assertively affirmative enactment for the realisation of the constitutional rights of women and to ensure that they do not become victims of any kind of domestic violence.

Husband’s Obligation to maintain wife under theDomestic Violence Act

In a case taken up by the Supreme Court i.e. Vimlaben Ajitbhai Patel v. Vatslaben Ashokbhai Patel and ors[9].it was held that when it comes to maintenance of wife under the Domestic Violence Act read with the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 it is the personal obligation of the husband to maintain his wife. Property of mother-in-law can neither be subject matter of attachment nor during the life time of husband can his personal liability to maintain his wife be directed to be enforced against such property.

Maintenance of mother under the Domestic Violence Act

In   the   case   of   Ganesh   S/o.   Rajendra   Kapratwar,   Abhijeet,   S/o.  Ganeshrao Kapratwar and Parijeet, S/o. Ganeshrao Kapratwar Vs. The State   of   Maharashtra   and   Sow.   Shantabai,   W/o.   Rajendra   Kapratwar[10] ,the   Bombay   High   Court   in   an   application  preferred by the mother for maintenance and medical expenses under the and medical expenses under  the Domestic Violence Actand the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance  Act, 1956 against her son and grandsons has held that:

“Grandsons   would   have   been   liable   to   pay   maintenance   to   grandmother   under Sections 22(1) of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956,   provided   their   father   had   not   been   alive and not   capable   of   paying   maintenance.”

Retrospective application of the Domestic Violence Act

In the case of V.D.   Bhanot   Vs.   Savita   Bhanot[11], which upheld the Delhi High Court’s view that  “even a wife who had shared a household before the Domestic Violence Act came into force would be entitled to the protection of the Domestic Violence Act.

Hence, the Domestic Violence Act entitles the aggrieved person to file an Application under the Act even for the acts which have been committed prior to the commencement of the Domestic Violence Act.

Also read Filing domestic violence case is not an act of cruelty

Also read Who can claim relief under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005

Through this article we wish to help those women who are in genuine need of help and are willing to file complaint against domestic violence. The Domestic Violence Act is a welfare legislation for those in need and is a powerful weapon in the hands of women who are being abused by their family members.

[1] Section 2(f) of Domestic Violence Act– Domestic relationship-   “domestic relationship” means a relationship between two persons who live or have, at any point of time, lived together in a shared household, when they are related by consanguinity, marriage, or through a relationship in the nature of marriage, adoption or are family members living together as a joint family;

[2] Section 2(s) of the Domestic Violence Act

[3] AIR 2007 SC 1118

[4] (2010) 10 SCC 469

[5] The term Palimony was first used by the US Court in the case of Marvin Vs. Marvin (1976) 18 C3d660

[6] (2011) 3 SCC 650

[7] Archana Hemant Naik v. Urmilaben I. Naik & Anr., 2009 (3) Bom Cr 851

[8] 2016 (2) SCC 705

[9] 2008 (4) SCC 649

[10] 2010   (112)   BOMLR   1082

[11] (2012) 3 SCC 183


Summoning of an Accused in a Criminal Case is a very Serious Matter »

« LEGAL SHORTS: Dying Declaration- Law and Important Judgments

Categories:Delhi High CourtLegal AdviceLegal NewsLegal ViewsSupreme Court

Tags: Bhartiben Bipinbhai Tamboli v. State of Gujrat and ors.Domestic ViolenceEconomic AbuseHusband’s Obligation to maintain wifeImportant judgments on domestic violencePhysical AbuseRespondent u


   


Chances of getting Anticipatory Bail in cases of 498a/406


Chances of getting Anticipatory Bail in cases of 498a/406

The Supreme court quoted that the sections under 498a and 406 under the Indian penal code are widely misused and for no reason the husband and family members are prosecuted and jailed thereby tarnishing the reputation of the family the sections are exactly termed as legal terrorism.

Author Name:   nitish788

The Supreme court quoted that the sections under 498a and 406 under the Indian penal code are widely misused and for no reason the husband and family members are prosecuted and jailed thereby tarnishing the reputation of the family the sections are exactly termed as legal terrorism.

Anticipatory bail in 498a /406 offences

The Supreme court quoted that the sections under 498a and 406 under the Indian penal code are widely misused and for no reason the husband and family members are prosecuted and jailed thereby tarnishing the reputation of the family the sections are exactly termed as “legal terrorism”.

The supreme court in recent judgement of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar has made mandatory compliance of guidelines

All the State Governments to instruct its police officers not to automatically arrest when a case under Section 498-A of the IPC is registered but to satisfy themselves about the necessity for arrest under the parameters laid down above flowing from Section 41, Cr.PC;

All police officers be provided with a check list containing specified sub- clauses under Section 41(1)(b)(ii);

The police officer shall forward the check list duly filed and furnish the reasons and materials which necessitated the arrest, while forwarding/producing the accused before the Magistrate for further detention;

The Magistrate while authorising detention of the accused shall peruse the report furnished by the police officer in terms aforesaid and only after recording its satisfaction, the Magistrate will authorise detention;

The decision not to arrest an accused, be forwarded to the Magistrate within two weeks from the date of the institution of the case with a copy to the Magistrate which may be extended by the Superintendent of police of the district for the reasons to be recorded in writing;

Notice of appearance in terms of Section 41A of Cr.PC be served on the accused within two weeks from the date of institution of the case, which may be extended by the Superintendent of Police of the District for the reasons to be recorded in writing;

Failure to comply with the directions aforesaid shall apart from rendering the police officers concerned liable for departmental action, they shall also be liable to be punished for contempt of court to be instituted before High Court having territorial jurisdiction.

Authorising detention without recording reasons as aforesaid by the judicial Magistrate concerned shall be liable for departmental action by the appropriate High Court.

We hasten to add that the directions aforesaid shall not only apply to the cases under Section 498-A of the I.P.C. or Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the case in hand, but also such cases where offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may be less than seven years or which may extend to seven years; whether with or without fine.

But once FIR under 498a/406 is registered the apprehension of arrests looms even with the guidelines and safeguards as to be mandatory implemented by police. The police can follow the guidelines and can arrest the person . still the offences are non-bailable and possibility of an arrest looms on the person.

But generally the trend in court is that the anticipatory bail is granted in the cases of matrimonial offences under the penal code but very strict conditions are imposed these are-:

Return of dowry articles
As held in Vijender sharma v. state Anticipatory Bail was granted subject to the conditions that the petitioner will return all the gold/silver jewelry articles still in his possession to the complainant before the concerned SHO.  petitioner will deposit a sum of Rs.1 lakh additionally with the Registrar General of this Court in the name of the complainant, which amount shall be disbursed subject to the outcome of the trial of this case. The petitioner will join investigation as and when required and would not intimidate the witnesses.

2. By giving maintenance amount and returning jewellery
As held in Dr. Sunil Kumar V. State. With consent of parties, afore-noted applications are disposed of with the following directions:
(a) Rajesh would replace all the cheques which he has issued in the name of Shalini Arya pursuant to orders passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate in the proceedings under Protection of Women against Domestic Violence Act, 2005 by issuing cheques in the name of ‘Shalini’. This would be done within a week from today.

(b) Photocopies of the medical treatment of Baby Bhavishika would be handed over to Rajesh. Rajesh would be entitled to consult a reputed cardiologist and future medical treatment of Baby Bhavishika would be borne by Rajesh.

(c) Future medical of Shalini pertaining to treatment for tuberculosis by her would be reimbursed by Rajesh on the bills being furnished by Shalini to Rajesh.

(d) Rajesh would continue to pay to Shalini Rs. 10,000/- per month or such other amount as may be directed to be paid by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in the proceedings under Protection of Women against Domestic Violence Act, 2005 by means of a cheque payable in the name of ‘Shalini’.

(e) Rajesh would facilitate visit by the I.O. in company of Shalini to his house for opening the almirah in which cloths and jewellery of Shalini are stated to be kept. Shalini would be permitted to take possession of the same after an inventory is prepared.

(f) All the petitioners would cooperate with the I.O. in the conduct of investigation.

On compliance of afore-noted consent directions, in the event of arrest, petitioners would be released on bail by the I.O. on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of I.O.

18. It is made clear to Rajesh Arya that any violation of the terms of the consent directions would render liable to be withdrawn the benefit of the present order.

3. Bail without any condition of return of dowry items
In Vishal Arora V. state In my opinion, the petitioner cannot be denied bail on the ground that dowry and jewellery of the complainant has not been returned so far. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has taken a stand that the entire dowry and jewellery has already been returned to her. There seems to be a dispute between the parties on this aspect. If her dowry and jewellery is not returned, then she may take proper proceedings before the competent Court for return of dowry and jewellery as per law.

In the facts and circumstances of the case stated above, it is ordered that the petitioner may be released on bail in the event of his arrest on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. The petitioner is directed that he shall participate in the investigation as and when called by the Investigating Officer. In the event the petitioner fails to participate in the investigation, then the State will be at liberty to apply for cancellation of his bail.

4. Bail as contents of FIR are vague
In the present case of Pavitra Uraon And Ors. vs State of Chhattisgarh, if we consider the contents of the FIR, lodged by the complainant on 24-1-2007, it shows that she was being treated with cruelty by the applicant on account of demand of dowry. However, the specifications regarding dowry are vague and general pertaining to the items etc.

5. Complainant residing in matrimonial home
Proceedings under Section 498A/406/34 IPC are not to be converted into recovery proceedings. However, it is the desire of a Court to try and ensure that matrimonial disputes are resolved. Attempts were made in the present case in this direction, but unfortunately have failed.

Considering the fact that the complainant is still residing in the matrimonial house, but in a separate portion thereof and the fact that she and her children are otherwise being provided with maintenance by the petitioner No. 1, I am inclined to admit the petitioners to anticipatory bail as prayed for. It has to be additionally noted that the petitioners have cooperated with the investigating officer during enquiry. Since 6.2.2004 petitioners are under interim protection.

Petition stands disposed of with the direction that in the event of arrest, on petitioners furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 5,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, petitioner would be released on bail.

Conclusion
Generally the bail in matrimonial proceedings are easy but may come with stringent conditions. the Anticipatory bail in cases of 498a/406 are granted easily these days and conditions depends on facts of each case.

 


ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3
Print this Article

Author Bio:   Advocate Nitish Banka, advocate supreme Court of India. nitish@lexspeak.in

Email:   Nitish@lexspeak.in

Website:   Lexspeak.in

Views:  264

Comments  :   

 

How To Submit Your Article:

Follow the Procedure Below To Submit Your Articles

Submit your Article by using our online form Click here
Note* we only accept Original Articles, we will not accept Articles Already Published in other websites.
For Further Details Contact: editor@legalserviceindia.com

 

File Your Copyright - Right Now!


Online Copyright Registration in India
Call us at: 9891244487 / or email at:admin@legalserviceindia.com

File Divorce in Delhi - Right Now!

File Your Mutual Divorce -
Call us Right Now at: 9650499965 / or email at: tapsash@gmail.com

Lawyers in India - Search By City

Delhi
Chandigarh
Allahabad
Lucknow
Noida
Gurgaon
Faridabad
Jalandhar
VapiMumbai
Pune
Nagpur
Nashik
Ahmedabad
Surat
Indore
Agra
JalgaonKolkata
Siliguri
Durgapur
Janjgir
Jaipur
Ludhiana
Dimapur
Guwahati
AmritsarChennai
Chandigarh
Hyderabad
Coimbatore
Eluru
Belgaum
Cochin
Rajkot
Jodhpur

LawyersLegal AdviceArticlesSite MapContact Us©2000-2018 All Rights Reserved Legal services India.com

Top

FacebookTwittergoogle_plusPinterestShare